Email this article 
(Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia)(2) Syamsul Alam
(Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara)(3) Muhammad Yusuf
(Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara)(4) Taufik Taufik
(Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara)(5) Andi Ahmad Malikul Afdal
(Handayani Makassar University, Makassar Sulawesi Selatan)(6) Laxmi Laxmi
(Anthropology of Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara)*corresponding author
AbstractThis study aims to explore the role of information technology innovation, particularly E-Government, in enhancing governance dynamics and efficiency in addressing challenges related to corruption. Employing a qualitative approach with phenomenology, the research focuses on elucidating individual experiences with the implementation of E-Proksi at the Kendari City Inspectorate. Data collection involved interviews and observations, with data validation conducted through triangulation to ensure accuracy and consistency. The findings indicate that the technological innovation introduced by the E-Proksi application in Kendari City has positively influenced both corruption prevention and the enhancement of public services. However, the application encounters challenges such as public preference for traditional methods, insufficient socialization, and suboptimal political and regulatory support. Adaptive organizational culture and dynamic capabilities emerge as crucial factors in ensuring the program's success. Continued efforts to increase public participation and responsiveness to change are essential for achieving governance that is efficient, transparent, and accountable. Through ongoing strategic updates and attentive consideration of community feedback, E-Proksi is anticipated to significantly contribute to fostering a more effective, cleaner, and adaptable government in Kendari City.
KeywordsE-Government; Dynamic Governance; E-Proksi; Corruption
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v8i1.1.1188 |
Article metrics10.29099/ijair.v8i1.1.1188 Abstract views : 161 | PDF views : 20 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
J. Xu, S. She, and W. Liu, “Role of digitalization in environment, social and governance, and sustainability: Review-based study for implications,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961057.
E. G. Carayannis, L. Dezi, G. Gregori, and E. Calo, “Smart Environments and Techno-centric and Human-Centric Innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A Quintuple Helix Innovation System View Towards Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Solutions,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 926–955, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00763-4.
J. Costa and J. C. O. Matias, “Open Innovation 4.0 as an Enhancer of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, p. 8112, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12198112.
A. G. Quintana, E. Urquía-Grande, and M. L. D. Jalón, “Strategic Conceptual Theories and Sustainable Cooperation Among Stakeholders in E-government, E-participation, and Social Media,” Cent. Eur. J. Public Policy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 46–63, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.2478/cejpp-2022-0007.
M. Kamil, A. Roziqin, and Y. Rahmawati, “Dynamic Governance Model Within Integrated Waste Management In Malang City: Agile People And Process In Actions,” J. Stud. Pemerintah., vol. 12, no. 3, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.18196/jgp.123140.
A. A. K. Anshar, K. A. N. Kennan, and R. R. Rafif, “Prevention and Eradication of Corruption With Information and Communication Technology Progress,” J. Law, Polit. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.38035/jlph.v1i1.33.
N. Karniawati, “Inhibiting Factors for E-Government Implementation in Local Government,” J. Gov., vol. 6, no. 1, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.31506/jog.v6i1.10768.
A. Aji Nugroho, N. Sri Rahayu, and R. Ranintya Yusuf, “The Role of e-Government to Improve the Implementation of Merit System in Indonesian Local Goverments,” KnE Soc. Sci., Jun. 2023, doi: 10.18502/kss.v8i11.13570.
S. Khan, R. Umer, S. Umer, and S. Naqvi, “Antecedents of trust in using social media for E-government services: An empirical study in Pakistan,” Technol. Soc., vol. 64, p. 101400, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101400.
V. Lapuente and S. Van de Walle, “The effects of new public management on the quality of public services,” Governance, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 461–475, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1111/gove.12502.
O. Velsberg, U. H. Westergren, and K. Jonsson, “Exploring smartness in public sector innovation - creating smart public services with the Internet of Things,” Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 350–368, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1761272.
E. Andriollo, A. Caimo, L. Secco, and E. Pisani, “Collaborations in Environmental Initiatives for an Effective ‘Adaptive Governance’ of Social–Ecological Systems: What Existing Literature Suggests,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 15, p. 8276, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13158276.
G. Scholz and N. Methner, “A social learning and transition perspective on a climate change project in South Africa,” Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions, vol. 34, pp. 322–335, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.011.
M. Mayarni, “Implementation Of Dynamic Governance Concept In Regional Government Of Siak Regency,” Iapa Proc. Conf., p. 35, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.30589/proceedings.2018.179.
B. S. Neo and G. Chen, Dynamic governance: Embedding culture, capabilities and change in Singapore. 2007. doi: 10.1142/6458.
K. Nasri, H. Boubaker, and N. Dhaouadi, “Dynamic governance of the first wave of Covid?19 in Tunisia: An interoperability analysis,” World Med. Heal. Policy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 366–381, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1002/wmh3.508.
R. C. Kurniawan, D. Faedlulloh, A. Warganegara, and D. Hermawan, “Multilevel dynamic governance in dealing with crisis: the case of handling corona virus disease 19 (COVID-19) in Lampung Province, Indonesia,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2222574.
Y. Liang, M. J. Lee, and J. S. Jung, “Dynamic Capabilities and an ESG Strategy for Sustainable Management Performance,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. May, May 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887776.
M. E. Milakovich, Digital Governance. New York: Routledge, 2021. doi: 10.4324/9781003215875.
L. Luna-Reyes, C. Juiz, I. Gutierrez-Martinez, and F. B. Duhamel, “Exploring the relationships between dynamic capabilities and IT governance,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 149–169, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1108/TG-09-2019-0092.
M. C. Dong, D. K. Tse, and K. Hung, “Effective Distributor Governance in Emerging Markets: The Salience of Distributor Role, Relationship Stages, and Market Uncertainty,” J. Int. Mark., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1–17, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1509/jimk.18.3.1.
W. J. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative adn Mixed Methods Approaches. 2018.
M. & Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3, Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press. USA: Sage Publications, 2014.
H. Haerana, U. Congge, S. Syamsu, E. Yulyana, and K. Karinda, “The Study of ‘Healthy Alley’ and Home Care Program Policies to Develop Sustainable Health Innovation in Makassar, Indonesia,” J. Gov. Public Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 33–44, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.18196/jgpp.v11i1.17254.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
________________________________________________________
The International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Organized by: Departemen Teknik Informatika
Published by: STMIK Dharma Wacana
Jl. Kenanga No.03 Mulyojati 16C Metro Barat Kota Metro Lampung
Email: jurnal.ijair@gmail.com
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.