(2) Didi Suryadi (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)
(3) Tatang Herman (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)
(4) Sufyani Prabawanto (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)
*corresponding author
AbstractThis research is motivated by the existence of learning obstacles experienced by students in learning fraction division calculation material. The learning obstacle is caused by the learning design that is designed has not facilitated the suitability of the material, method, use of media, way of thinking and student characteristics. The purpose of this study was to obtain a comprehensive description of the implementation of didactical design of fraction division arithmetic operation in class V in terms of learning obstacles, hypothetical learning trajectory and Didactical and Pedagogical Anticipation developed by teachers based on Didactical Situation Theory and student characteristics. The research method used Didactical Design Research. The research subjects were grade V students at a public primary school located in Gugus 23 Bandung City, totalling 10 students. Data collection techniques used documentation study, lesson observation, test data collection, interview, and triangulation. The results showed that the learning obstacle that emerged after the initial didactical design was implemented in learning included psychological ontogenic obstacles, instrumental ontogenic obstacles, and ontogenic conceptual obstacle. Epistimological obstacle is the limited experience of students in solving story problems. Didactical obstacle is that students always get the solution without searching and finding it themselves. The learning trajectory found included one student who had previous learning experience related to fraction division material. Students are more interested in solving in the form of pictures and number lines, with the aim of relieving boredom in mathematics lessons. Didactical anticipation was spontaneously given, namely by providing scaffolding in understanding the meaning of the problem, for example determining the characteristics of story problems that work by means of division calculation operations, determining and changing the size of units of length, weight, and volume. Based on the research results obtained, to overcome the various problems that arose during the implementation of the initial didactical design, the authors recommend an alternative solution in the form of a revised didactical design that has been modified for use with students with different characteristics.
KeywordsLearning Obstacle, Learning Trajectory, Didactic Design, Fraction Division.
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v6i1.2.859 |
Article metrics10.29099/ijair.v6i1.2.859 Abstract views : 279 | PDF views : 5 |
Cite |
Full TextDownload |
References
Lemonidis, C; Kaiafa, I. (2019). The Effect of Using Storytelling Strategy on Students' Performance in Fractions. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(2). 165-175. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n2p165.
Stelzer, F; Andrés, M. L.; Canet-Juric, L.; Urquijo, S.; Richards, M.M. (2019). Influence of Domain-General Abilities and Prior Division Competence on Fifth-Graders' Fraction Understanding. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3). 489-500. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5751.
Eichhorn, M.S. (2018). When the fractional cookie begins to crumble: Conceptual understanding of fractions in the fifth grade. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 4(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.382933.
Namkung, J. M., Fuchs, L. S. & Koziol, N. (2018). Does Initial Learning about the Meaning of Fractions Present Similar Challenges for Students with and without Adequate Whole-Number Skill? Grantee Submission, Learning and Individual Differences. 61, 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.018.
Alkhateeb, M. A. (2019). Common Errors in Fractions and the Thinking Strategies That Accompany Them. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2). 399-416. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12226a.
Čadež, T.H., et al. (2018). How Fifth-Grade Pupils Reason About Fractions: A Reliance on Part-Whole Subconstructs. Educational Studies in Mathematics. Springer Nature B.V.
Bentley, B., & BosseÌ, M. J. (2018). College students’ understanding of fraction operations. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3881.
Mukwambo, M., Ngcoza, K. & Ramasike, L.Fl. (2018). Use of Angle Model to Understand Addition and Subtraction of Fractions. Pedagogical Research, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.20897/pr/85174.
Kor, L.K.; Teoh, S-H; Mohamed, S S E B; Singh, P. (2019). Learning to Make Sense of Fractions: Some Insights from the Malaysian Primary 4 Pupils. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14 (1), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3985.
Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactiques des mathematiques, 1970-1990 (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, V. Warfield Eds & Trans). Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Pulishers.
Ratnasari, R. (2018). Students’ Errors and Misconceptions about Operations of Fractions in an Indonesian Primary School. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 8(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v8i1.66.
Julie, H. (2017). The elementary school teachers’ ability in adding and subtracting fraction, and interpreting and computing multiplication and division fraction. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v1i1.5114.
Iskenderoglu, T. A. (2017). The Problems Posed and Models Employed by Primary School Teachers in Subtraction with Fractions. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(5). 239-250. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.3089
Coskun, D. S., (2019). An Examination of Meanings and Error Types Associated with Pre-service Elementary Teacher’s Posed Problems for the Multiplication and Division of Fractions, European Journal of Education Studies. 6 (4), 99–113.
Sitrava, R.T., (2019). The Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Subject Matter Knowledge: The Context of Division of Fractions. European Journal of Education Studies. 5(12). 268-285.
Suryadi, D. (2019). Penelitian Didactical Design Research (DDR) dan Implementasinya. Bandung: Gapura Press.
Harel, G. (2008). A DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction. Part II: with reference to teacher’s knowledge base. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 893–907. Doi: 10.1007/s11858-008-0146-4
Harel, G. (2008) What is Mathematics? A Pedagogical Answer to a Philosophical Question, (pp. 265–290). https://doi.org/10.5948/upo9781614445050.018
Suryadi, D. (2015). Didactical design research (DDR). [Online]. Diakses dari: didi-suryadi.staf.upi.edu/profil.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications.Inc.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th Edition. Educational Research. Boston: Pearson Education.
Prabawanto, S., & Mulyana, E. (2017). Developing Lesson Design to Help Students’ Triangle Conseptual Understanding. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), p.0123172. IOP Publishing. Doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012060
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
________________________________________________________
The International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Organized by: Departemen Teknik Informatika
Published by: STMIK Dharma Wacana
Jl. Kenanga No.03 Mulyojati 16C Metro Barat Kota Metro Lampung
Email: jurnal.ijair@gmail.com
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.