An Analytic Network Process Method Approach to Design Models of Lecturers Performance Evaluation

(1) * Fenny Purwani Mail (Information System Study Program, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah, Indonesia)
*corresponding author


One approach to greatly enhance the quality of university education level is improving the quality and career of lecturers, including services to students. Therefore, performance and work ethic are critically evaluated to obtain re-liable information. Most performance evaluations are limited to assess students in the classroom exclusively. This research employed a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), a model designed to evaluate the lecturer’s performance and factors influencing their performance. These factors were examined from various variables, such as training and development experience, motivation, self-esteem, competency, and job satisfaction. To demonstrate the correlation and dependency among factors of lecture performance evaluation, this study employed the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method, which is part of MCDM technique. The ANP method could serve different levels of stakeholders by considering available criteria and sub-criteria. Moreover, the method could predict performance measurement of human resources by considering factors affecting lecturer’s performance. This research produced a model to evaluate lecturers’ performance effectively


Performance, Motivation, Self-Esteem, Job Satisfaction, MCDM



Article metrics

10.29099/ijair.v6i2.283 Abstract views : 253 | PDF views : 44




Full Text



Miller Barbara A, Assessing Organization Performace in Higher Education. San Francisco: John Wily & Son. Inc, 2007.

T. H. Retnowati, D. Mardapi, B. Kartowagiran, and S. Hamdi, “A Model of Lecturer Performance Evaluation: Sustainable Lecturer Performance Mapping,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 83–102, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.1426a.

F. Purwani, “Analysis of computer science curriculum development to improve competency of graduates for global workforces market,” in Regionalization and Harmonization in TVET, 2017, pp. 297–300.

Y. Liang, “Intelligent Emotion Evaluation Method of Classroom Teaching Based on Expression Recognition State of the Art,” vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 127–141, 2019.

Hazriyanto and B. Ibrahim, “The factor analysis of organizational commitment, job satisfaction and performance among lecturers in Batam,” J. Tech. Educ. Train., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 151–158, 2019, doi: 10.30880/jtet.2019.11.01.19.

J. Bungai and I. Perdana, “Evaluation of Performance Lecturer on Implementing Tridharma College,” Indones. J. Educ. Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 174–182, 2018, [Online]. Available:

F. Adam and J. Kamase, “The effect competence and motivation to satisfaction and performance,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 132–140, 2019.

R. R. . P. B. Nadkarni, “A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings,” J. Build. Enggineering, vol. 32, 2020.

K. Ahmed, Muhammed; Harris, Irina; Govinda, “A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 217, pp. 171–184, 2019.

M. Thenarasu, K. Rameshkumar, J. Rousseau, and S. P. Anbuudayasankar, “Development and analysis of priority decision rules using MCDM approach for a flexible job shop scheduling: A simulation study,” Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, vol. 114, no. March 2021, p. 102416, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2021.102416.

T. Ghaemi Rad, A. Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. Abbasi, and S. M. Choi, “A methodological framework for assessment of ubiquitous cities using ANP and DEMATEL methods,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 37, no. November 2017, pp. 608–618, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.024.

S. H. Alilou, Hossein; Rahmati, Omid; Singh, Vijay P.; Choubin, Bahram; Pradhan, Biswajeet; Keesstra, Saskia; Ghiasi, Seid Saeid; Sadeghi, “Evaluation of watershed health using Fuzzy-ANP approach considering geo-environmental and topo-hydrological criteria,” J. Enveronmental Manag., vol. 232, pp. 22–36, 2019.

A. Kumar et al., “A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 69, no. October 2016, pp. 596–609, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191.

O. A. Arda, D. Delen, E. Tatoglu, and S. Zaim, “An analytic approach to assessing organizational citizenship behavior,” Decis. Support Syst., 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2017.08.004.

H. C. Lee and C. Ter Chang, “Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 92, no. May, pp. 883–896, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.007.

T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. New York: Springer, 2013.

Luthans Fred, Organizational Behavior Seventh Edition. Singapura: McGraw-Hill Book, 1995.

S. P. Robbins and T. A. Judge, Organizational Behavior. Jersey: Pearson International Edition, 2007.

S. Coopersmith, The Antecedent of Self-Esteem. San Franciszo: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1998.

L. . Spencer and S. . Spencer, Competence at Work: Models for Superrior Performance. Ney York, USA: John Wily & Son. Inc, 1993.

H. S. Khabat Khosravi, “A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods,” J. Hydrol., vol. 573, pp. 311–323.

C. Chen Lee, Hsing; Tee Chang, “Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 92, pp. 883–893, 2018

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


International Journal Of Artificial Intelligence Research

Organized by: Departemen Teknik Informatika STMIK Dharma Wacana
Published by: STMIK Dharma Wacana
Jl. Kenanga No.03 Mulyojati 16C Metro Barat Kota Metro Lampung


View IJAIR Statcounter

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.