
(2) John Pieris

(3) Aarce Tehupeiory

*corresponding author
AbstractLegal politics in the era of technological development, makes the legal profession, especially notaries, have to keep up with the times. A notary in carrying out his position as a Notary utilizes technology to facilitate the implementation of that position. Notaries as public/state officials have the authority to make authentic deeds. Notaries in carrying out their profession are required to adapt and keep up with the times, the goal is to be able to face the challenges of global competition. As time goes by, of course Science and Technology (Science and Technology) continues to develop, so that there are facilities such as internet networks and electronic media that can be used for two-way communication and make it possible to see each other such as chat, teleconference and video-conference . GMS can also be held via teleconference, considering cost and time efficiency. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies regulates things that can be done through teleconference media regulated in Article 77 Paragraph (1) of the PT Law so that it allows shareholders to hold GMS without having to meet in person and be in one place but can carried out by teleconference which allows shareholders to see each other and actively interact in meetings. The method used in this research is normative legal research which is carried out as an effort to obtain the necessary data related to the problem. The data used is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. In addition, primary data is also used to support secondary data legal materials. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative juridical analysis methods. Fromthe results of the study can be obtained that the GMS held by teleconference is invalid because it violates the provisions in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m UUJN which requires the physical presence of the parties in the process of preparing an authentic deed so that the power of proof of the deed under the hands as a result of an act committed not in accordance with Article 16 Paragraph (1) letter m. Notaries in this case have roles and functions related to cyber notaries. The deed of the GMS was made with a cyber notary and the signing is permissible and legal to do because in Article 77 of the PT Law it is very clear that it is regulated, especially the signature gets legal protection provided by the ITE Law but the Cyber notary has not been fully supported by legislation in Indonesia, although there is a possibility, it cannot be carried out because it is limited by other laws, so cyber notaries cannot be implemented legally in Indonesia. There is still a need for specific arrangements regarding cyber notaries in Indonesia. KeywordsLimited Liability, Company Notary, Electronic GMS
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v6i1.2.731 |
Article metrics10.29099/ijair.v6i1.2.731 Abstract views : 64 |
Cite |
References
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 1971 tentang Perubahan dan Penambahan atas Ketentuan Pasal 54 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang. Lembar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1971
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Lembar Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 117 Tahun 2004. Tambahan Lembar Negara Nomor 4432
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Lembar Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 106 Tahun 2007. Tambahan Lembar Negara Nomor 4756
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Lembar Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2014. Tambahan Lembar Negara Nomor 5491 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang Staatsblad Nomor 276 Tahun 1938
Adjie, Habib. Hukum Notaris Indonesia. PT. Reflika Aditama. Bandung. 2008.
Amirudin dan H. Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo. Jakarta. (tt atau tanpa tahun).
Ashshofa, Burhan. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. 1998.
Fuady, Munir. Perseroan Terbatas Paradigma Baru. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung. 2003.
Indonesia. Hukum Bisnis dalam Teori dan Praktek. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung. 2006.
Kansil, C.S.T. dan Christine S.T. Kansil. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta. 2005.
Makarim, Edmon. Notaris dan Transaksi Elektronik, Kajian Hukum tentang Cybernotary atau Electronic Notary. ed. ke-2. Rajawali Pers. Jakarta. 2013.
Mansur, Didik M. Arif dan Elisatris Gultom. Cyber Law. Aspek Hukum Teknologi Informasi. Cetakan ke-2. Refika Aditama. Bandung. 2009.
Satrio, J. Perseroan Terbatas (Yang Tertutup) Berdasarkan U.U. No. 40 Tahun 2007. Bagian Pertama. Rajawali Pers. Depok. 2020.
Tobing, G.H.S Lumban. Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Erlangga. Jakarta. 1996.
Widjaya, I.G. Rai. Hukum Perusahaan. cet. 1. Kesaint Blanc. Jakarta. 2000.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
________________________________________________________
International Journal Of Artificial Intelligence Research
Organized by: Departemen Teknik Informatika STMIK Dharma Wacana
Published by: STMIK Dharma Wacana
Jl. Kenanga No.03 Mulyojati 16C Metro Barat Kota Metro Lampung
Email: jurnal.ijair@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.